Industry · MAXIMUM crypto policy
QNSP for Government & Sovereign Cloud
FedRAMP, NIS2, and sovereign-residency PQC for federal, state, municipal, and supranational deployments.
Sovereign-residency PQC deployments for federal/state/municipal agencies and supranational bodies under FedRAMP, NIS2, and equivalent mandates. Customer-controlled VPC, customer-managed HSM, and audit chains that survive jurisdictional review.
Threat model
What we're defending against
The HNDL, regulatory, and operational threats specific to this vertical.
Data-residency under sovereign jurisdiction
Citizen records, tax data, and inter-agency correspondence must remain under the originating jurisdiction's legal control. VPC-pinned QNSP deployments enforce residency at the infrastructure layer.
Long-cycle public records
Title deeds, court records, and benefits-history span 30–80+ years. HNDL exposure is asymptotically certain on this timeframe without PQC.
Adversarial-state harvest of inter-agency traffic
Diplomatic cables and inter-agency briefings captured in transit today have ongoing value as historical intelligence. PQC-TLS today removes that asymptotic exposure.
Compliance mapping
Frameworks this vertical operates under
QNSP supports continuous evaluation for 7 live frameworks; other named frameworks are architecturally supported with evidence available on request.
| Framework | How QNSP maps |
|---|---|
| FedRAMP (Moderate / High) | QNSP architecturally targets FedRAMP Moderate and High; the 3PAO process is the gating step. Aligned to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 SC-13 (cryptographic protection). |
| NIS2 (EU) | Article 21 risk-management measures and Article 23 incident reporting — QNSP continuous evidence and tamper-evident incident logs. |
| FIPS 140-3 | Module-level validation roadmap; CAVP algorithm validation in progress. |
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 ↗ | A.5.34 Privacy and protection of PII; A.8.24 Use of cryptography. |
| CJIS Security Policy | Section 5.10 (Cryptography) for criminal-justice information — supported via maximum crypto-policy tier and BYOH HSM. |
QNSP architecture
Capabilities mapped to this vertical
How QNSP services compose to meet this vertical's needs.
Deploy into customer-owned AWS/Azure/GCP VPC under sovereign jurisdiction
ML-KEM-1024 + ML-DSA-87 + FN-DSA-1024 + SLH-DSA-256f — strongest FIPS-finalized parameter sets
Customer-controlled HSM root of trust — QNSP never holds master keys
Cryptographically chained logs verifiable by IG / GAO / equivalent reviewers
Outcomes
What deploying QNSP for this vertical delivers
- ✓Maximum crypto-policy tier — strongest FIPS-finalized parameter sets across KEM and signature
- ✓Sovereign data residency enforced at infrastructure layer (private VPC) and key layer (BYOH HSM)
- ✓Audit chain verifiable by IG / GAO / equivalent independent reviewer
- ✓Architecturally aligned to FedRAMP, NIS2, CJIS, ISO 27001 — continuous evidence
For your engineers
Build patterns that map to this vertical
When you've evaluated the platform, hand these references to your engineering team.
Next step